Planning application – register your objection NOW!
Published: October 2025
Further to our previous email regarding the recently submitted Planning Application it’s now time to register your objections. We need as many as possible. Objections can be made by every individual adult so please encourage everyone in your household and friends and family who might not get this email to make their own. The deadline for comments is Wednesday 5th November (not 21st Nov as previously communicated).
How do I comment on the Planning Application?
Online – the easiest way to comment online via this link - Ref 25/01596/PA
- This may take you directly to the application or click ‘Search applications’ and search using the application reference number ‘25/01596/PA’
- Click on the application and then the blue box “Please, click here to comment on this application”
- Fill in your details. Please note the requires you to enter a house number, even if your house does not have a number, otherwise you will receive an error when you submit. Just put “0” in this field and put your house name in the “House/Building name” field – otherwise you will receive an error message when you attempt to submit!
- For “Commentor role”, the majority of you will enter “Neighbour” if you live locally or “Interested Party”.
- “Comment Text” – enter your reasons for objections. You have 3000 characters (roughly 500 words). Please personalise your responses and feel free to talk about the importance of the pub as a community asset and your views on how the pub has been managed by the current owner. We have included the top key reasons for objecting to the application below. Please feel free to include whichever ones resonate with you – you do not need to include them all!
- Typical objections are 2-3 paragraphs in length and the form is simple and shouldn’t take more than 5 minutes to complete.
- If you wish to submit comments that are longer than the 3000 characters allowed by the form then please do so via email – [email protected].
- The Committee / Parish Council are developing a detailed response that will include all of these points with supporting evidence plus we have commissioned an independent Heritage Assessment and Viability Assessment that we will include.
You can submit comments by email to [email protected]. You can do this if you are having trouble with the form or should you wish to submit a more detailed set of comments. The deadline for comments via email is the same as online – Wednesday 5th November.
Key Reasons for Objecting
- Community value ignored
The Black Horse Public House is officially recognised as an Asset of Community Value (ACV), which means its social importance must be a key factor in any planning decision. The application does not adequately address this status. - Pub viability threatened
The proposal would drastically reduce the pub’s size, facilities and opening hours, making it commercially unviable and likely to fail. The design appears intentionally set up for the pub to not succeed. Regardless of any noise, the positioning of proposed residential units next to a reduced sized public house, is highly likely to lead to conflict between the two uses. - Ignoring local demand and independent viability report
An independent report says the reduced pub would not be commercially viable, is a sub-optimal size, ignores current market requirement to include a food offer and ignores the local and sub-regional market for a successful public house in Stansted that could serve tourist and guest requirements for the London Golf Club, the local wedding venue (The Black Barn, Court Lodge), tourists that visit and walk the local countryside, cycle groups and the families of local villages that have all seen their local pubs close in recent years. - Planning Policy Non-Compliance
The National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF 2024, paragraphs 88, 98 and 200) supports keeping accessible local and community services, particularly where there's no alternative option. Many of the residents in the village and surrounding areas used the pub over many years and there is no evidence that the full pub is no longer needed, and many similar pubs have been closed locally limiting alternative options. Just because the owners' marketing campaigns and running of the pub over the last 3 years wasn't effective doesn't mean it's not valued or needed. The emerging Local Plan includes Policy INF4, which aligns with NPPF 2024 and requires demonstration that the pub is no longer needed, viable or there is adequate provision elsewhere locally. - Heritage harm
The Public House is also both a designated and non-designated heritage asset, being located within the Stansted conservation area and a historic building. It is a key heritage asset (note: the Committee have commissioned a separate independent Heritage Assessment) within the village and conservation area. The application harms the character and appearance of the Conservation Area. - Poor quality housing and loss of B&B rooms
The proposed four residential units with limited private amenity do not meet modern space and amenity standards, will not attract elderly residents to abandon family homes (as suggested by the applicant) and seem to target single persons, who will have to rely on private car for access to services and jobs, with no public transport. The proposal will see also see the loss of 3 B&B rooms on the first floor (which are part of the public house and have been used by the current owner for residential use without a change of use permission). - Loss of Community Parking
The plan does not mention keeping car parking used by the nearby St Mary’s church, which is important for the community. - No affordable housing
The site does not qualify as Grey Belt, and there is no provision for affordable housing included. - Lack of Cooperation and bigger ambitions
The applicant will not engage with the Parish Council who are willing and able to acquire at market value and run the pub for the community (as demonstrated by the recent acquisition of Grange Park School and the monthly pop-up pub nights at the local village hall attended by up to 120 people). The applicant appears to have bigger ambitions to build houses on the public house land not included in the application boundary, facilitated by the removal without conservation area consent, the trees that would have restricted this ambition. - Justification for Green Belt VSC “Very Special Circumstances”
A number of the VSC listed are not valid: 1) Bio-Diversity Net Gain is a legal requirement of any application and nothing is proposed in this application which argues BNG exemptions by limiting the red line boundary of the application site and removing any existing habitat within the red line boundary 2) proposing 4 substandard residential units does not contribute to local housing needs 3) use of Previously Developed Land (PDL) is not a VSC, it is a sustainable development objective required of most applications where possible.
Frequently Asked Questions
- What is the deadline for submitting my comments? Wednesday 5th November. If you are reading this after the deadline then please do still send your comments via email – they may still be considered.
- Do I have to live in Stansted and Fairseat Parish or Tonbridge and Malling to comment? No. Anyone can object to the Planning Application regardless of where they live.
- Is it just one set of comments per household? No – every adult can object individually so please encourage others to do so.
- Lots of people I know have already commented on the application - do I really need to? Yes please! Every comment counts and the more objections we can lodge, the better. It really does make a difference.
- I am really busy, will it take a long time for me to lodge my objections? No. The online form takes 5 minutes to complete.
- I have a question about the process or would like to discuss my objections with someone before I submit? Feel free to contact the Steering Committee at [email protected]. We will also be at the Pop-Up Pub Night on Friday 31 October.
- My neighbour doesn’t have access to the internet or email but still wants to object. If possible, please help them complete an online form for them and include their details on the form. If they wish to write to the council then the address is FAO Susan Field, Planning Officer, TMBC Planning department, Gibson Building, Gibson Drive, Kings Hill, West Malling, Kent, ME19 4LZ – please include the Planning Reference 25/01596/PA in the letter.
What else are the Committee doing?
- We have reviewed the application in detail and are working with the Parish Council to submit our own set of detailed comments.
- We have commissioned a professional Planning Consultant to advise the Committee.
- We have commissioned an external Heritage Assessment report and independent Viability assessment and Valuation report which will be included with our detailed response.
- The Parish Council have requested that the Planning Application be ‘called in’ for review – this means that the TMBC Planning Committee will discuss the Application at a future Committee meeting (date TBC).
A reminder for those that missed the last email - what has been submitted?
The owner of the Black Horse Pub has submitted a Planning Application to Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council: Ref 25/01596/PA. In summary, the application seeks permission for
- The conversion of part of the ground floor of the public house (dining room, kitchen and store) to form two studio flats
- The conversion of the existing b&b rooms and manager accommodation at first floor level (above the public house) to form two 2-bed flats
- The retention of the remaining ground floor commercial space for use as a public house, with access to a small rear terrace / beer garden
- The re-use of a small part of the existing beer garden as communal garden for the benefit of the occupants of the flats
Finally, we will be providing a face-to-face update at the Halloween Pop Up Pub event this Friday 31st October. The event starts at 19:00 with the update at 20:00. We look forward to seeing many of you there.
Thank you, from your Project Steering Group